logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2021.01.20 2020고정1220
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant held a debate on church issues in the distribution of the B1st floor arts around May 15, 2020, which was a private person collected in the facts charged, and around 19:00 around May 15, 202.

At around 21:25 on the same day, the Defendant sold to E even after D's house, and sold for two years before D's house, in relation to the victim D( South, 56 years old).

We need to see the control system confirmation.

“Along with the knowledge of Jeju City, D House Dog's several arms in the Gug-si;

This is why we can do so.

Many of the parts are required to do so.

E also sold or required to be sold.

After recording the statement, “after recording the statement,” the 10 members of May 16, 2020 using the Kakakao Stockholm on May 16, 2020, allowing the recording to all (77 members). Therefore, it is difficult to deliver (f7 members) fake news.

In addition to “the message”, “the sound recorded” files were sent to “the sound 003.m4a” file.

Accordingly, with the aim of slandering the victim, the Defendant posted a false fact openly through the information and communication network, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

2. The facts charged of the instant case are crimes falling under Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc., and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s will specifically manifested under Article 70(3) of the same Act.

After the prosecution of this case, the injured person expressed that he does not want the punishment of the defendant, and the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow