1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 25, 2016, the Plaintiff’s loan certificate for the Plaintiff’s Preparation (A evidence 3-1, B-2) paid to the Defendant on August 25, 2016, the amount of 30,000,000 won for the long-term brain ginseng of approximately 50,000,000 won in the market price of Hongcheon-gun Co., Ltd. owned by the Plaintiff and the remainder of 30,000,000 won shall be repaid by October 25, 2016.

(v) to borrow funds.

(2) On August 30, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) purchased and borrowed a loan to the Defendant on August 30, 2016, a loan certificate stating “B 30,000 won; (b) on the loan of KRW 30,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won and KRW 30,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won;

"No. B. 3 No. 1)" was drawn up and drawn up.

B. The instant payment order (Evidence A 5 and 7) issued by the Defendant against the Plaintiff to the Hongcheon District Court of Chuncheon, the Defendant filed an application with the Plaintiff for the payment order at the rate of KRW 15% per annum from the date following the delivery date to the date of repayment on August 11, 2016, the Plaintiff borrowed KRW 30 million from the Defendant on August 18, 2016, KRW 60 million on August 18, 2016, KRW 30 million up to September 23, 2016, KRW 30 million up to October 25, 2016, KRW 30 million up to October 25, 2016, and KRW 30 million up to December 25, 2016, stating that the Defendant had not repaid the said money until the due date.

On December 26, 2016, Hongcheon District Court 2016Da497, Hongcheon District Court 2016, Hongcheon District Court 2016, the payment order was served on the Plaintiff on December 29, 2016, and the Plaintiff did not raise an objection within two weeks, which became final and conclusive on January 13, 2017, because the Plaintiff did not raise an objection within two weeks.

(2) Each loan certificate prepared by the Plaintiff on August 25, 2016 and August 30, 2016 by the Plaintiff on August 25, 2016 (hereinafter “instant payment order”) shall be the Defendant who mobilized tin-openers, while the Plaintiff fully repaid the money borrowed from the Defendant.