logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.07.23 2014고정480
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is an employee of the defendant.

1. On July 2009, the Defendant, within the Geumjin-gu Kumdong-gu Geumdong-gu Geumdong-dong-gu Geumdong-gu, Geumdong-gu, Seoul around the end of July 1, 2009, stated that “The Defendant would be 7 marine in the family litigation. The mother should sell due to hospital expenses, and is not selling the gap in the selling price.” The Defendant stated that “The Defendant would lend the money of one million won in return for the payment of the money.”

However, the defendant has no intention or ability to repay money without raising a lawsuit.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was immediately issued a gold of one million won by the victim.

2. On August 7, 2009, the Defendant called the victim B by phoneing it to the French land, and attempted to sell KRW 2,000 per ppuri 2,00,000,00 agricultural company located in the Republic of Korea to the victim B. However, the Defendant stated that the purchaser who must solve the loan from the agricultural cooperative gives me a long-term brain value, and then remitted 1,200,000,000 won to the non-party C.

However, the defendant does not have any intention or ability to pay money with no intention to do so, and there is no intention or ability to pay money.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received a remittance of KRW 1.2 million from the victim to the post office account (D) of the non-party C designated by the Defendant.

3. On August 10, 2009, the Defendant called the above victim from the French land on August 10, 2009, and sent gold KRW 1.1 million to E’s account, thereby having to complete payment with selling 3.1 billion to 3.1 billion. Moreover, the Defendant said that he was “Woman” even in his business.

However, the defendant has no intention or ability to sell brain or pay money.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 1,100,000 from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative (G) account of No. E except the case designated by the Defendant, and received KRW 3,300,000 from the victim three times.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. B.

arrow