logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 영동지원 2015.11.05 2015고단187
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On March 21, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the Gwangju District Court’s net support, and the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence on July 26, 2013 at the Net Prison.

[2015 Highest 187]

1. On February 2015, the Defendant made a statement to the effect that “The victim D operated by the victim D in the Chungcheongnam-dong, Chungcheongnam-dong, Chungcheongnam-do, the Defendant would pay a fine due to traffic accident,” to the victim.

However, the defendant only attempted to use the above money for entertainment expenses by receiving the above money from the victim, and there was no reason to pay a fine due to traffic accidents. Therefore, even if he received the above money from the victim, he did not intend to use the above money for the payment of a fine due to traffic accidents.

The defendant received 1.5 million won in cash from the victim as a fine for traffic accidents in the same place.

2. On February 2015, the Defendant told the victim to the effect that “the Defendant shall pay 1.2 million won as the daily living expenses for continuing work” at the place indicated in paragraph 1, and that “the Defendant shall pay 1.2 million won as the daily living expenses for continuing work.”

However, even if the Defendant received the above money from the victim, he did not intend to continue to work at the farm operated by the victim.

The defendant received 1.2 million won in cash from the victim under the pretext of living expenses in his/her job.

3. On March 17, 2015, the Defendant stated to the effect that “The Defendant sent KRW 500,000,000 to the farm because he did not want to go to go to the farm by leaving the phone in the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si adjacent to the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant called to the effect that “the Defendant shall go to the farm.”

However, even if the Defendant received the above money from the victim, he did not intend to use the money as the rent to return to the farm operated by the victim.

The Defendant received 50,000 won from the victim to the account in the name of F under the name of the victim.

In this regard, the defendant made three times the victim.

arrow