A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 29, 2015, at around 10:45, the Defendant: (a) taken photographs of toilets, etc. to identify the circumstances of the instant case by the head of the police station C District of the original police station who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 on August 10:45, 2015; (b) took a bath to identify the circumstances of the instant case; (c) took a bath without any justifiable reason under the influence of alcohol; and (d) took a slope of the said D’s arms; and (e) took a slope of the said E’s arms, and (e) took a son of the head.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to hear victim's D Telephone Statements);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Order to Attend Training is an ordinary concurrent crime on the grounds of sentencing, so the sentencing guidelines do not apply.

In light of the reflective nature of violence, one time (205), the fact that there is suspended execution, the degree of damage, etc.