logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.09.03 2015고단1772
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business with the trade name “D” in the area of Suwon-si, Suwon-si C2.

The Defendant, from October 2012 to March 4, 2015, had a male customer receive 100,000 won from a male customer on the D “D” and provided guidance to the customer, and had a female sexual traffic, such as E, take into the said sexual traffic into the said sexual traffic, take the female into custody of the customer’s sexual organ, and arranged the female sexual traffic to take into custody of the customer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning the F;

1. E statements;

1. Determination as to the period of running the business of arranging photographs;

1. With respect to the confession of the defendant, the defendant consistently recognizes the facts of the arrangement of commercial sex acts, but the statement is not consistent during the period of doing business of arranging commercial sex acts.

In other words, the Defendant stated at the police investigation stage that “from March 10, 2012 to March 4, 2015,” “from June 2014 to March 4, 2015,” “from June 4, 2015 to March 4, 2015,” and “from October 2014 to March 4, 2015, from March 4, 2015” during the third trial of which a public defender was appointed. In particular, the Defendant consistently asserted to the effect that the Defendant had consistently engaged in the business of arranging sexual traffic during the middle due to the lack of business performance.

Considering the fact that the period of the arrangement of commercial sex acts is not related to the sentencing, in particular, it is important factor in the calculation of the additional collection charge, the confession statement made by a public defender prior to hearing advice from a public defender among several confession statements made by the defendant is likely to have done the arrangement of commercial sex acts in a sense that recognizes the fact that the defendant has conducted the arrangement of commercial sex acts without sufficiently considering the importance of the period of the arrangement of commercial sex acts.

The defendant has taken over the business of this case.

arrow