beta
Text
1. The Defendant (Appointeds) KRW 129,052,368, KRW 67,485,218, KRW 43,452,52, and KRW 527, and KRW 43,4527, respectively, to the Appointeds C.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff and the designated parties are the retired workers who were retired while serving between August 1, 1984 and November 15, 2013.
B. If the Plaintiff and the designated parties calculated the difference between the amount of wages and retirement allowances which were not received from the construction of brick industry during the period of service and the amount of substitute payment received from the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation after retirement, the Plaintiff asserts that the amount of 129,052,368 won should be deducted, 67,485,218 won, 67,45,218 won, 43,452, 452, 52, 68, 527 won, 68, 673, 68, 150 won, 171,408,072 won, and 171,408,072 won and the designated parties claimed that the amount of overdue payment should be deducted from the amount of bonuses paid to the Plaintiff and the designated parties on February and March 2, 2012, and the Plaintiff and the designated parties did not dispute the above argument, thereby recognizing only the amount of unpaid retirement benefits and substitute payment paid by the Defendant.
(c).
On June 26, 2012, the Act was commenced on July 3, 2012 after filing an application for rehabilitation procedures with the Seoul Central District Court 2012 Gohap116, and the Act was commenced on December 24, 2013. The Defendant was appointed as the custodian in the said procedure.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-5, Gap evidence 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the above facts of determination, the defendant, who is the administrator of brickd Construction, shall be 129,052,368 won, 67,485,218 won, i.e., the remaining amount after deducting substitute payment from the above amount in arrears to the plaintiff, i.e., 67,452,527 won, i., i.e., d., i., e., son E, 68,373,150 won, i.e., 68,408,072 won, and 171,408,072 won, i.e., the day following the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case to the Appointd Construction, and i.e., each of the above amounts, the defendant shall be sentenced to this decision that