1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. At around 17:20 on April 27, 2018, C driven E (hereinafter “instant bus”) owned D (hereinafter “instant bus”) and stopped his/her vehicle on the two-lane and three-lanes from among the three-lane roads in the Hannam-ro, Daejeon-ro, Hannam-ro, the 115-ro, at the Hannam-ro, to ensure that passengers get out of the three-lane road. However, H (hereinafter “the instant Oba”), a passenger F who was driven by G with the back of the instant bus, was merely a road between the right side of the instant bus and its delivery (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. F was injured due to the instant accident, and the Plaintiff, a mutual aid business entity, which entered into a mutual aid agreement for the instant bus, paid KRW 1,315,860 in total, including medical expenses, to F until July 5, 2018 in accordance with the said mutual aid agreement.

C. The defendant is an insurer who has concluded a liability insurance contract for the Oralba in this case.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 1 to 5, each of the statements or images (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. According to the above facts, in order to get off the bus stop, the accident of this case shall be close to India as far as possible, and shall be checked as possible, and shall be checked as to the accident of this case, even if there is a duty of care to safely get off the bus back through the rear mirror, and even though there is a duty of care to safely get off the bus at a place far away from India, the negligence of C, the bus driver of this case, and the negligence of C, the bus driver of this case, and the bus of this case, when the bus stops at the bus stop at the bus stop, may expect passengers to get off the bus of this case, but even if it could expect that the bus of this case would get off the bus of this case, the accident of this case, which proceeded unreasonably between the bus of this case and the delivery, was caused by the negligence of G, a driver, as joint tortfeasor, as to the accident of this case.