The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the victim did not have a blue blue in a way that the defendant had a blue blue in a lue lue luse luse luse luse luse luse, etc.

2. We examine the judgment of the court below and the trial of the court below, H stated that the restaurant operated by the defendant exceeded the click display place, and it was in the restaurant. At the time of the crime, H stated that the victim was not able to get out of the restaurant. However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and by the witness I’s legal statement, namely, the defendant acknowledged that the click display place on the side of the restaurant operated by the victim was pushed up, so that the clicks displayed inside the kitchen did not fall off. The victim was working inside the front floor of the click display place at the time of the crime, but even after the crime of this case, it is difficult to view the clicks of the victim to have been found in the front and rear of the crime of this case, since it was difficult to view the clicks of the victim to have done the crime of this case since it was hard to see that there was a large amount of glusium and blusium, etc. after the crime of this case.