Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
One gift certificate (B, No. 1) seized is a victim's name.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 11, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. in the Jeonju District Court’s military mountain support, and completed the execution of the said punishment on June 12, 2017.
"200 Highest 425"
1. Larceny;
A. A. On March 14, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around 1:04 on March 14, 2020, around 1:04, at the front parking lot of Donsan-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant confirmed that the ESW car door owned by the victim C was not corrected; and (b) opened a driver’s seat and opened a driver’s seat to collect the victim’s property in the aggregate amount of KRW 90,000 won, including KRW 60,000 and KRW 10,000,000,000 won, and three copies, etc., of the Donsan-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.
B. On March 21, 2020, the Defendant: (a) around March 23, 2020, around 24:00 to around 24:00, confirmed that there was no number-free vehicle correction; and (b) entered the said vehicle into the name-free vehicle and left a 100,000 original instrument with one ticket owned by the victim in the name-free container box.
Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victims' property two times in total.
2. On March 23, 2020, the Defendant attempted to larceny: (a) at the H apartment parking lot located in the Hasan-si, Hasan-si; (b) discovered the victim I’s low-speed car which was parked in the said parking lot; (c) opened a seat and opened a seat; and (d) attempted to steal KRW 113,00,00 of the market price at which he was placed in the front seat of the said car; (d) but (e) attempted to steal KRW 1 million in cash and KRW 113,00,000 in the back of the said vehicle, but did not lead to such attempted crime, as it was discovered by the victim who was computer on the back of the said vehicle.
around 00:28 on March 11, 2020, the Defendant discovered that the said car is not corrected and entered into a passenger car and then used the said smart key to drive the car by using the said smart key. The Defendant finds that the said car is not corrected and that the said smart key is kept.