A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On May 26, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Seoul Central District Court, and on May 27, 201, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Seoul Central District Court on May 27, 201, and on August 25, 2011, sentenced a fine of KRW 1,000,000 to a fine for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on August 31, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 31, 2011, and completed the execution of the said final sentence on December 19, 2012.

On June 12, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court, and on December 22, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months, such as larceny. On September 20, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for night building intrusion and larceny at the Jung District Court, and on November 23, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Larceny) at the Jung District Court and completed the execution of the sentence on February 23, 2020.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around March 22, 2020, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) issued an order for alcohol and alcohol within the “AP” operated by Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government AO for a victim’s AO located in Jongno-gu, Seoul, with two sub-credit cards owned by the victim’s cell phone storage cases located on the table table.

Accordingly, the defendant has been sentenced to imprisonment not less than three times due to larceny, but has committed larceny again during the period of repeated crime.

2. Fraud and violation of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act;

A. On the same day, the Defendant, after theft of the card, posted the stolen credit card to the victim, who was a taxi engineer in his name in the vicinity of the Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government business establishment, as if he were the Defendant’s credit card, and had the victim pay KRW 4,600 on the taxi.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim, and 4.