(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2016.11.03 2016고정61

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2016.11.03 2016고정61

상해

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 29, 2016, Defendant A suffered injury on the part of the victim’s face and body part of the victim’s fighting with the victim while fighting with the victim, on the ground that the victim B (B, 57 years of age) does not assist in work at the F plant located in Incheon-si, Incheon-si, and on the ground that the victim B (B, 57 years of age) did not assist in work, Defendant A and the victim suffered injury, such as the removal of internal walls and internal walls necessary for treatment for about 28 days.

2. Defendant B

A. In the date, time, place, etc. described in paragraph (1), the injured Defendant satise the victim’s face part by drinking while fighting with the victim A (A and 44 years of age) for the said reason, and continued to satisfing the victim’s face by hand around 10:42 on the same day, and led the victim to satisf, satfe, sat, etc. in the part where treatment for about 20 days is required.

B. Around April 29, 2016, the Defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim by taking piracy, which is a dangerous object on the floor ( approximately 86 cm in total length), at the above location, at around 10:42 on April 29, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement, Defendant B’s partial legal statement

1. Each legal statement of witness A and G;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant A by the police;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Investigation report (to attach screen pictures and field photographs to the site);

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. As to the crime of injury, Defendant B and his defense counsel asserted that even though the victim’s face was taken by drinking, the victim’s face was not taken by hand, and that there was no fact of using the victim’s salkin, sale, etc. with respect to the crime of injury.

However, in full view of the consistent and detailed statements of the victim, the statements of witnesses G, the background of the occurrence of the case, and the part and degree of the injury inflicted on the victim, Defendant B may fully recognize the fact that Defendant B inflicted the sacrife of the part in which the victim was discovered, and caused the sacrife and the face.

Defendant

B and his defense counsel's above assertion is acceptable.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2012.10.29 2012고단5371

-창원지방법원 2014.10.14 2014고단1927

-창원지방법원 통영지원 2017.04.14 2016고단1584

-서울북부지방법원 2018.02.07 2017고단4723

-부산지방법원 서부지원 2019.08.22 2019고정138