Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 3.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 03:00 on May 20, 2018, the Defendant assaulted the victim B (23) at the street 1 p.m. 77 p.m. (77 p.m.) in front of the exit-gu, Mapo-gu, Seoul, with a view to taking a vision without any particular reason, and assaulting the victim B (23 p.m.) at one time on the face of the victim by drinking.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender on the ground of the fact described in paragraph (1) from D by the superintendent of the police station in Mapo-gu Seoul, Seoul, the police station C District of the police station that was dispatched to the site after receiving a report of 112 on May 20, 2018; and (b) was transferred to the Mapo Police Station in Seoul, and was on the same day on around 03:40 on the same day, and was in transit to D in the vehicle while moving to the Seoul Mapo Police Station.

C. Bags, dead, or discarded, and whether there is any person to be known at the later time;

While referring to “the tax to be paid in fluor,” fluoring that fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor of a fluor of a bitch, fluor of D’s face face was walking once, thereby hindering the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the transfer of

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to B or D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (with respect to the circumstances leading up to interference with the performance of official duties), a report on investigation (related to the wearing of a suspect lock), and a report on investigation (Attachment to a photograph of

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the crime of this case is committed under the influence of alcohol without any particular reason, and is committed by the police officer who received a report and received a desire to do so, and the nature of the crime is not good. In light of the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, while the defendant committed violent crimes, even though he had a criminal record of a fine imposed once because he committed violent crimes, he was 14 years prior to the punishment, his mistake is recognized.