beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On June 22, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) was a person who worked in office at the site of the removal of the pipes and disposal equipment of the B building engine room conducted by Nonparty Co., Ltd.; and (b) around 15:40 on June 22, 2013, the Plaintiff suffered bodily injury, such as “integrosiss on the left side of the bridge” and “integratorss on the side of the slives inside the slives unit” and “integrhs on the side of the slives unit” from the Defendant, received medical treatment with the approval of the medical treatment, and was determined as class 14 of the disability grade.
B. On February 9, 2015, the Plaintiff asserted that the symptoms were repeated on the same side of the previous branch of the previous year, and filed an application for additional medical care with the Defendant for additional injury to “stoke and pellet damage on the part of the unit” and “stoke stoke stoke stoke stoke stoke stoke stoke stoke stoke stoke s to the left side of the unit,” but the Defendant did not confirm the aggravation of symptoms as a result of comparison of the Plaintiff’s images taken on March 6, 2015 with the images taken on November 20, 2014, and applied for additional medical care and additional medical care on the ground that the “stoke stoke stoke stoke stoke stoke stoke s to the face” and “stoke stoke stoke stoke stoke s to the face.”
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 to 3 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination on the legitimacy of the disposition
A. On June 22, 2013, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff sustained injury on the left sloping part of the left sloping and continued to receive medical treatment after receiving medical treatment from the Defendant, due to an accident falling from about 3 meters of a shooting bridge at the construction site, and after completing medical treatment. Ultimately, the Plaintiff’s inspection conducted at C Hospital on November 17, 2014, which led to the Plaintiff’s failure to undergo medical treatment.