The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who operates a “C” convenience store.

At around 23:00 on February 7, 2013, the Defendant: (a) on the ground that the Victim E (V) who is an employee at the C convenience store located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was dismissed from work, the Defendant is unable to work for not less than 23:5:0 on the ground that he was unable to work for not less than 23:5:00 on the ground that he was dismissed from work; (b) on the other hand, the Defendant returned two months of the monthly salary that he is paid anywhere to work.

“I, in order to use the part of the victim’s refusal to cut off the monthly salary or to refuse to do so, I would like to get the victim off the clothes, knee knee knee, knee knee kn, kn kn kn kn, and kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn's kn's kn's mother to the police station of the party kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn'. I n't kn't kn't kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's k'

2. The instant facts charged are crimes falling under Article 298 of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 11574, Dec. 18, 2012) and can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 306 of the same Act. Since the victim revoked his/her complaint against the Defendant on August 5, 2013, the prosecution of this case was dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.