The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is as follows: (a) the Defendant changed the vehicle line from five lanes to four lanes at the time of the instant case; (b) the Defendant changed the vehicle line to four lanes; and (c) the vehicle speed of the Defendant was reduced to three lanes in order to change the vehicle line to three lanes to turn to the left; and (d) the Defendant did not immediately drive the vehicle to threaten the victim.

2. The Defendant also asserted the same as above in the lower judgment.

The court below rejected the defendant's assertion and found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case on the grounds that the victim C's statement was consistent from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, and that it was reliable because it was consistent with other evidence, such as black image CDs.

In full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the above judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and there is no error of law by mistake of facts as alleged by the defendant.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.