Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was in Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu; and (b) was in the D church to confirm the invalidity of the resolution of the union conference between the victim E and the Defendant [the Daejeon District Court Decision 2015 Gohap 102135, 2016 Gohap 10167 (Counterclaim)]; and (c) was rendered a compulsory adjustment order on December 16, 2015; and (d) the judgment or revocation decision was not rendered; (b) however, the Defendant did not raise any objection against 78 persons, such as the Flao G of the Korean Ethical branch of the Ethical branch of the Ethical branch of the Ethical branch of the Korean branch of the Korean branch of the Korean branch of the Korean branch of the Japanese branch of the Korean branch of the Korean branch of the Korean branch of the Korean branch of the Korean branch of the Korean branch of the Korean branch of the Japanese branch of the Korean branch of

On December 16, 2015, I issued a cancellation decision.

e-mail containing false facts, such as “,” was sent in the list of annexed crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the reputation of the victim E by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement protocol (E);

1. Details of the e-mail prepared by the recipient, the publicly known contents relevant to each of the facts constituting the crime, and the compulsory conciliation ruling 2015 Gohap 102135;

1. A decision on a provisional disposition suspending the validity of 2014Kahap 1639, a decision on a provisional disposition suspending the performance of duties by 2015Kahap 10053, a decision on a decision made by the F association of the Republic of Korea F association of the K association of the K association of the K association of the K association of the K association of the K association of the K association of the K association of the K association of the K association of the K association of the K association of the K association of the K association of the F association of the K association of the F association of the K association of 2016, a decision on the disposition of the 104 K association of the 2015 K

1. Relevant Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act (a comprehensive determination of fines) concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendant did not think that the facts indicated in the list of annexed crimes were false at the time of sending e-mail as indicated in the facts charged.

Therefore, there was no intention to recognize false matters, namely, there was no intention.

2. Considering the following circumstances, the Defendant may be found as evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court: