Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, and for one year, each of the defendants B.

However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant B was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor on May 23, 2017 by means of night buildings, larceny, etc. at the Suwon Franchi, and on May 31, 2017, the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 31, 2017, and is currently under the suspended sentence period. On December 12, 2017, Defendant B was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Suwon Flachi, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 20, 2017.

[2] Defendant B, on October 2017, committed a crime, who stolen a mobile phone as it is necessary to keep the cell phone from being detained on the ground that Defendant B was in the trial of fraud at the present.

The defendant A accepted it, and the defendant B confirmed the internal structure of the mobile phone store and conspired to take the role of informing the defendant A of it, and the defendant A conspired to take the role of stealing the mobile phone into the above store and stealing the mobile phone.

1. The Defendant B found the victim G in the cell phone repair shop operated by the victim G, who was aware of the victim G, in the middle of October 2017, at H and the third floor of Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which was operated by the victim G, and confirmed the inside structure of the above store, cash storage place, course of intrusion, etc., notified the Defendant A thereof, and stolen the opon in the above cell phone store.

The defendant A accepted the proposal.

A. On October 19, 2017, the Defendants, who attempted to larceny, prepared to commit a crime even though they were in custody around 03:00 on October 19, 2017, and used the gap in the victim’s leaving the cell room to repair the cell, Defendant B, using the gap in the victim’s leaving the cell room, reported the network in the vicinity. Defendant A, who opened and intruded the window outside the air-conditioner room on the outer wall of the building and opened the window outside the door of the building, and then failed to carry out the purport thereof, on the ground that the cash and a son, which was in custody at the outside of the building, attempted to steals, but failed to wear the inner window, because of the lack of inside windows.

As a result, the Defendants jointly attempted to steal the victim's property.