beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A was sentenced to one year of suspension of execution of official duties on March 27, 2015, by obstructing the performance of official duties in the support for the development of the Sugwon method, etc. On August 21, 2015, upon being sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor from the Sugwon method, etc. on August 21, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 25, 2015, the sentence of the said suspension of execution was invalidated, and the execution of the said sentence was completed at the public prison on August 24, 2016.
Defendant
B was sentenced on November 19, 2015 to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the support for the development of the Sugwon method, and on September 30, 2016, the parole period was passed on September 20, 2016 when the sentence was executed by Angyang Prison.
1. The Defendants of the 2017 Highest 1176 Defendants are the actual sellers (victims) who intend to purchase the goods. The fact by deceiving a person who intends to sell the goods as if the actual purchaser was the one who intended to sell the goods was the one who did not intend to sell the goods, and the fact by deceiving the victim with the intention to purchase the goods without any intention or ability to sell the goods.
Defendant
B, on November 27, 2016, in order to purchase Aphones first to sell Aphones at a non-place.
In contact, after identifying the account to remit payments from C, a letter will be posted on the NAV and the NAC of the Republic of Korea, “I sell Aphone 6”, and the victim D who reported and contacted the above article will deliver Aphones to E by transferring the price to E account.
“Along with a false statement, the victim shall transfer KRW 185,00 to the SC Il Bank account under the name of E designated by C, and the Defendant A confirmed that the victim remitted the money to C, and then contacted C with C and received a 6 mobile phone delivery from the G convenience store located in the F in the Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-si on the same day.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim to deliver 185,000 won to C by deceiving the victim, and receive the delivery of 185,000 won at the market price from C to 6.