logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.10.26 2017고단1550
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 21, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud at the District Court for the District Court on November 20, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence on November 20, 2015.

1. On March 10, 2016, the Defendant purchased various items, such as new shoes, military uniforms, and sheep, from the military unit in Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-si, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-si, Seoyang-si, to the victim E in the “D” coffee shop, and raises a lot of profits from selling them to the outside. At this time, the Defendant is a sale plan on the knife on the knife of the U.S. military base in the Southwest-gu market.

When lending money, it was said that it would be paid half of the principal as well as the profits after selling the military shoes.

However, the fact was that the defendant thought that he was able to use the money borrowed from the injured party for his daily living expenses, etc., and there was no intention or ability to purchase the new money in the Pyeongtaek-si military unit.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and was issued KRW 10,50,000 to the agricultural head of the Tong in the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim.

2. On March 21, 2016, the Defendant, at the same place on March 21, 2016, planned to purchase an unmanned practice flight machine to be used by the U.S. military forces at this time for training from the victim.

When lending money, the said practice aircraft was sold, and the profits were distributed, and the principal and half of the profits were paid.

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he was able to use it as an urgent amount of money borrowed from the injured party, and there was no intention or ability to purchase an unmanned practice flight machine in Pyeongtaek-si military unit.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 20 million won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative head of the Tong in the name of the defendant on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Complaint;

1. A certificate of deposit in each exchange;

1. Previous convictions: inquiries into criminal records, judgments, and individuals;

arrow