Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, who was the husband of B and his husband, was not in dispute due to the ordinary monetary problem with B, was killed as soon as possible due to traffic accidents on January 28, 2019.

On January 29, 2019, around 22:45, the Defendant was unable to have avoided five minutes by means of drinking 40 or more visitors on the spot where B and the bereaved family members of the network C are in the presence of “sprinke, sprinke,” etc., and continuously 23:25 on the same day, at around 23:25, the Defendant was suffering from the Defendant’s inner part of the Defendant’s cell phone at the seat of the E Hospital D, E Hospital’s funeral hall No. 302, which was located in Chungcheongnam-dong, Chungcheongnam-dong, the Defendant was unable to have avoided five minutes by means of drinking 40 or more visitors on the ground that B did not her own, and neglecting her own, and her bereaved family members of the network C were in the presence of the Defendant. In short, the Defendant was able to have avoided the Defendant’s cell phone over 30 minutes by means of melting the Defendant’s part on the floor.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the funeral ceremony of the deceased C twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and G;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 158 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (Aggravation of concurrent crimes with the punishment stipulated for a crime of interference with the second funeral ceremony with which the circumstances are heavier);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order [Incompetence] The crime of this case is not good because the defendant's physical suffering is added to the bereaved family who has already been missing in the upper trial by impairing the peace of funeral ceremony.

Defendant was punished for the same crime, and committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime.

【Pried circumstances】 The Defendant recognized the instant crime.

The bereaved families of the deceased C are against the defendant.