logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 07. 27. 선고 2017두40990 판결
(심리불속행) 대리인을 통한 이중계약서가 무효인지 여부[기각]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon High Court-2016-Nu-12828 ( October 23, 2017)

Title

Whether a double contract through an agent is null and void

Summary

(In light of the fact that the plaintiff does not seem to take any civil or criminal measure against the agent (performance assistant), the contract prepared by the agent cannot be deemed null and void.

Cases

Supreme Court-2017Du40990 ( October 27, 2017)

Plaintiff-Appellant

KimA

Defendant-Appellee

The director of the tax office

Judgment of the lower court

National Rotations

Imposition of Judgment

2017.27

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Examining the lower judgment and the grounds of appeal, the grounds of appeal by appellant are not included in the grounds of appeal under each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, or are deemed to fall under each subparagraph of paragraph (3). Therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per

arrow