A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2017. 2. 6. 01:03 경 강원 춘천시 C에 있는 'D' 주점 앞 노상에서, 피해자 E( 남, 19세) 과 피해자 F( 남, 18세) 가 담배를 피우다가 그 담뱃재가 자신에게 날렸다는 이유로, 주먹으로 피해자 F의 얼굴 부위 등을 수회 때려 바닥에 넘어뜨린 후 발로 피해자 F의 전신을 걷어찼고, 이를 말리는 피해자 E의 얼굴 부위 등을 수회 때려 바닥에 넘어뜨렸다.

As a result, the defendant suffered injury to the victim F, such as a flag and a flag of a baby in need of treatment for about 29 days, and suffered injury to the victim E in the head part requiring approximately 2 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. Photographs related to the case;

1. A photograph of a CCTV course;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act, as the punishment for concurrent crimes;

1. Scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines;

(a) Class 1 Crimes (the scope of recommended punishment) and No. 1 Crimes (the general injury) are the basic area (from April to one year and six months) (the person who has no special sentencing factor);

B. Class 2 Crimes [Scope of Recommendation] General Injury (General Bodily Injury) in the basic area (from April to one year and six months) (Special Sentencing Person)

(c) The scope of final sentence due to the aggravation of multiple offenses: April to February; and

2. The circumstances are favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant who was sentenced to the punishment in this case led to the confession of the crime in this case, and that there is no criminal record of suspended execution or more.

However, due to the assault by the defendant, one of the victims was seriously injured by the injury, such as the injury caused by a brupt, etc., the victim did not reach an agreement with the victims, and the damage was not recovered at all, and the defendant exercised violence against the police in the process of performing official duties even in 2016.