logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.07.31 2014고단4288
상해등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, as to the Defendants, this is against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 4, 2014, at around 20:48, the Defendant: (a) 32 at the Bupyeong-gu Art Center in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon; (b) Gambling and towing the flab in front of the Southern Square in front of the Dongam-gu, Incheon; (c) Gabling and towing the flab in front of the Southern Square; (d) Gabing the above actions from G to G, who was on 112 patrols, during the duty, performed the 112 patrol, he expressed that “I would be said to be flabe, flad, if you would be said to be flad; and (d) Gabbbbing the left part of the said G with the flabing part of G; and (e) flabing the flab part of G with the left part one time, and flabing it more than twice the left part with the hand floor.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with legitimate performance of duties concerning the 112 patrols of the above G G, who is a police official, and at the same time inflicted injury on the victim G (28 years of age) about two weeks in terms of the pipe and human salt, tension, etc. of the part in need of medical treatment.

2. Defendant B and Defendant C assaulted a police officer at the same time, at the same place, as described in paragraph 1(1) at the same time, and arrested a flagrant offender from a slope H belonging to the Incheon Bupyeong Police Station F District to interfere with the performance of official duties, Defendant B used the left part of the above H in order to stop the arrest of the flagrant offender from a slope H belonging to the F District of the Incheon Bupyeong Police Station, and she spared the left part of the above H, and spared the Defendant C used the above H’s car once.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender above H, a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of E, G, and H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a death diagnosis letter, police officer G bodily injury photo, police officer H violence trace photograph;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent legal provision on criminal facts: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties againstG) Defendant B and C: The performance of official duties against H under Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act.

arrow