logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.02.06 2012가합4141 (1)
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 201, the bankruptcy debtor, Pyeongtaek Chang-gu Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “F District”) received funding from the National Housing Fund, and made a public announcement of the invitation of occupants to the aggregate of 3,152 households in the total of 1,41,300 square meters (hereinafter referred to as the “instant first apartment”) G first apartment (hereinafter referred to as the “instant second apartment”), G second apartment (hereinafter referred to as the “instant third apartment”), G second apartment (hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment”), G third apartment (hereinafter referred to as the “instant third apartment”) with the following terms and conditions attached to each of the 827 households in total, 3,152 households in the instant apartment (hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment”).

- Next - The period of conversion for sale in lots (lease period): The construction cost (interest on one's own funds during the period of lease at the time of the announcement of recruitment - depreciation costs) and the average appraisal price in accordance with the Ministry of Construction and Transportation (management guidelines for public rental housing construction and management) shall not exceed the amount obtained by deducting the depreciation costs during the period of lease from the price of the relevant house calculated at the time of conversion in lots based on the construction costs of rental housing and housing site costs: The tenant may obtain the fixed date prescribed in Article 3 (1) of the Housing Lease Protection Act after entering into a lease contract after entering into the lease contract by the tenant, and the deposit shall have preferential payment rights.

On or around April 2002, Plaintiff H and this case’s first apartment 103 Dong 1504 (32 square), Plaintiff 110 Dong 304 (type 32), Plaintiff J and this case’s apartment 220 Dong 1202 (type 28), Plaintiff K and this case’s apartment 208 Dong 1701 (type 28), Plaintiff K and this case’s apartment 222 Dong 904 (type 32 square), Plaintiff M and this case’s 305 Dong 403 (type 32 square), Plaintiff N and Plaintiff 311 Dong 1703 (type 31) (type 31) (type 31) (type 31, 203) around November 203.

arrow