1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant completed the construction by obtaining a construction permit to newly construct the apartment complex of the head rice-based one complex (Haak complex) and the housing reconstruction and rearrangement project association and the apartment complex of the size of one commercial building on the ground of 847, the head of Ansan-si, the head of the Gu, the head of the Gu, the head of the management office, the head of the aged, the head of the Dong, the head of the security office, the head of the Dong, and the head of the Gu.

The plaintiffs are 46 square-type apartment units below 46 square-type apartment units.

b. The number of buyers who have bought lots or take over each apartment. The apartment of this case is composed of 9 23 square meters and 40 square meters, 28 square meters and 160 square meters, 32 square meters and 46 square meters and 80 square meters, 101 square meters, 102 square meters (28, 32 square meters), 103, 104 (23 square meters, 32 square meters), 105, 106, 106 (46 square meters), 107. 29, 207, 108, 297, 38, 294 square meters and 27. 36, 106, 106, 107, 208, 109, and 329 square meters of common residential area (see, e.g., 203 square meters). The defendant supplied the area of the apartment of this case from 203 square meters as follows.

D. Of the above parcelling-out area, the residential public area was calculated as follows:

In other words, the defendant divided the wall area among the residential public use area into the "exclusive public use area", and the remaining public use area (such as stairs room, elevator fault, etc.) other than it was divided into the "general public use area".