logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.06.04 2018고단1828
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Seoul Southern District Court 2018 Godan1828 is the primary charge.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim B (the family name, the 55 years old, the 55 years old, the 59 years old, the 59 years old, the 59 years old and the 59 years old and the 50s old and the

The following day from March 19, 2018 to 22:00 on the following day by the Defendant of "2018 Highest 1828"

3. From 20:04 to 04:04, the victim B threatened the victim B with the demand of the Defendant and the victim B who wishes to hedge at the residence located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D and E, and “I wish to send B/L pictures without delivery to their family members.”

"2018 Highest 4274"

1. Violation of Information and Communications Network Utilization Promotion Act;

(a) No person who commits a crime against victims C shall allow any person to reach another person repeatedly in the form of code, words, sound, image, or picture that arouses fear or apprehension through an information and communications network;

Nevertheless, at around 01:50 on March 15, 2018, the Defendant sent the F message, “AC Party’s denial of its identity is very winded at present, so it is necessary to confirm whether it is in the house” to the victim C’s mobile phone, and then sent the message to the victim during the period from around 01:50 to March 19, 2018, which caused fear or apprehensions over 10 times in total, as shown in Appendix I, as shown in Appendix I.

(b) No person who commits a crime against victim B shall repeatedly reach another person in the form of code, words, sound, image, or picture creating fear or apprehensions through an information and communications network;

Nevertheless, at around 12:15 on March 17, 2018, the Defendant, who was the victim B, she was the victim B, and was not the victim himself/herself, is not 'the mobile phone of the victim, regardless of the reason 'O'.

We also try to see how much he tried to do so, and how much he tried to do so, and we can see what kind of guyp such as guyp.

arrow