A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 20, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven a CAR car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.08% at a section of about 500 meters from the front of the marc cafeteria located in the marc dong in Busan Metropolitan City to the front of the entrance of the park located in the marc City.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) committed a two-lane road in front of the entrance entrance of a park located in the middle and middle-speed zone in the city of Gyeonggi-do at the above time, depending on the two-lane distance from the 2nd area of the Maok-si, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol, caused the victim D (79 years old)’s bicycle right side to the right side of the bicycle crossing the bicycle from the left side of the mastal course to the right side when he was negligent in the course of business, which did not properly look at the front side and did not operate the brake and steering gear accurately; and (b) caused the victim’s injury, such as a three-lane so that the victim needs to receive treatment for about eight weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A control report, on-site photograph, practical survey report, diagnostic report, and accident video CD [the instant accident occurred as the victim gets a bicycle across the central line of the road where separate wnings the bicycle, but the central separation sealing does not interfere with securing the view of the opposite vehicle, unlike the central separation stand, there was no other obstacle to the defendant's view, since there was no other vehicle at the time of the accident, there was a crosswalk that did not have any signal apparatus installed in the front door of the accident at the accident site, and thus there was a crosswalk that did not fall short of the number of times at the accident site, so the defendant was required to drive a special attention. The defendant was driving with drinking alcohol at the time of the accident, and the defendant also stated to the effect that he did not find the victim because he did not drink the alcohol in this court (the third side of the transcript of the defendant's newspaper).