beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years and fine for 2,00,000 won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On April 7, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Changwon District Court on April 7, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence in the first prison for the North Korean defectors on January 28, 2012.
【Criminal Facts】
404 highestest 404
1. On January 29, 2013, at around 17:40, the Defendant administered DNA 605 rooms in Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si, approximately 0.03G, psychotropic drugs, in a single-use injection machine, and in a way of injecting them into the following arms.
2. On January 29, 2013, at around 18:10, the Defendant: (a) the police officer called out after receiving a report on suspicion of medication of phiphonephones, attempted to inspect at the above hotel 605 room; (b) opened a window to be damaged; and (c) went under the bottom through the string engine; and (d) went through the later door to the G cafeteria for the operation of the Victim EF in Kim Sea, approximately 50 meters away from her mother telephones, and went into the victim’s residence.
The order of dismissal 2013dan946
1. At around 17:30 on October 11, 2012, the Defendant sold one disposable injection machine with 0.03G dilution to J at the guest room located in G Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si, in the amount of KRW 50,000.
2. On October 22, 2012, at around 15:30 on October 22, 2012, the Defendant sold one disposable injection machine with 0.03G dilution to J at the guest room located in K in Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si.
On September 3, 2010, the Defendant appeared in the court of Changwon District Court No. 126, Sept. 14, 2010, and took an oath against the Defendant M, who violated the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (fence) with respect to Defendant M, the said court of law No. 1201, Nov. 3, 2010.
At the time, the defendant testified to the effect that M was administered without knowing the fact that M was written by a satis, such as "dying and drinking dysat", in the question of "hysat" that M was written by a satis.
However, the defendant, however, required the above M to administer philophones.