A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by a fine of four million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was a person who worked as the head of the office at a sexual traffic business establishment of the trade name “D”, and the Defendant conspiredd with E to engage in the business on behalf of E on the condition that the employer shall pay a fine on behalf of E when the business establishment controls an investigation agency.

The Defendant, along with E, advertised 427, 828, 831, and 904 on the Internet site of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ftel 427, 828, 831, and 904 from the early July 2016 to September 1, 2016, as the owner of the business, advertised the said commercial name on the said Internet site, such as “G,” and received KRW 150,00 to 160,00 from male customers, such as H and I, who started to contact with the said advertisement, and directed them as the above officetels, and led women of sexual traffic, such as J, K, L, one name M, N,O, P, etc., who were waiting in the atmosphere, to have sexual intercourse with male guests.

As a result, the defendant conspired with E to arrange commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of J, Q, L, and I;

1. Each statement;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Chapter 12 of the On-Site Control Photographs, Chapter 12 of the Internet business establishment closure photographs, and Acts and subordinate statutes on the control site photographs;

1. The punishment of Articles 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, and the punishment of selective punishment, shall be concurrently imposed with imprisonment and a fine under Articles 30 and 24 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 and 2 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the Defendant’s reason for sentencing of the sentencing order under Article 334(1) is a situation unfavorable to the Defendant that it is difficult to say that the Defendant is about to conceal the unemployment, the scale and business period of the crime.

However, the defendant recognized the fact that he attempted to conceal unemployment late, and all of the crimes of this case are led to confession and repenting.