The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that there is no difference between the part front of the right side of the bus driven by the defendant and the part shouldered on the left side of the victim, such as the facts constituting a crime in the judgment of the court below.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court; ① the victim consistently stated in the police and the lower court’s trial to the effect that “the victim faced with the left shoulder part of the bus on which the Defendant is driving,” and ② the image recorded in the lock box installed inside the bus at the time begins, the victim begins driving the crosswalk, and the victim does not seem to go beyond the front part of the bus, for a short period of five hours after the victim’s body reaches the right side of the bus, and the victim appeared to go beyond the front part of the bus, and the victim appeared to go to go to the front part of the bus, and the victim appears to go to go to the front part of the bus, and the victim appears to go to go to the front part of the bus, and the victim appears to go to go to the front part of the bus, and the victim appears to go to go to the front part of the bus, and the victim appears to have been issued the victim’s body, and the victim’s name and the victim’s body was later discovered to the extent that it was “the victim was late.”