logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.02.03 2016고합844
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

A seized real estate transaction contract (No. 4) shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 2015, the Defendant came to know the Victim G through F, which was a branch of F, and on October 2015, when search and seizure of the investigation agency of the Defendant, a corporation I (hereinafter “I”) that was under investment agreements with the victim in connection with H business, was started, the Defendant attempted to acquire money by deceiving the victim as if he would hinder the custody of the Defendant’s representative or release the detainedJ from custody.

1. On October 9, 2015, the Defendant, who violated the law of fraud and defense, is promoting to obtain investment equivalent to KRW 10 billion from I in relation to the H business in the nearby coffee shop in the area of Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and around October 9, 2015, the Defendant is aware of whether the investment will be made if he is detained by the representativeJ in the course of investigation.

There was a question to the effect that “” was “.”

In this regard, the victim shows K, which had been under custody in his own vehicle, and his photograph taken by him in September 2009, as if he had a friendly relationship with K, and continued to make a phone call to the defendant's will, but he was able to make a phone call to the defendant's will be called the Cheongdae M, and "The current telephoneer is the Cheongdae M.

It will be ensured that the J president is not bound by her farcing to M.

To do so, 50,000 won is required to make a drinking and preparation for mobilization.

“A false representation was made.”

On October 21, 2015, the Defendant received a total of KRW 300,000 from the injured party by November 17, 2015, a total of KRW 300,000,000 from the coffee shop located in the Sungnam-si, Sungnam-dong, as shown in the list of crimes attached hereto, to release himself.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have a friendly relationship with the present K or Cheongdae M, and even if he received money from the injured party, the defendant's intent or ability to prevent the detention of the I representative or to release the detained J.

arrow