Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was issued a summary order of one million won as a crime of gambling at the Daegu District Court on March 22, 199, and on July 7, 200, sentenced to a summary order of 1.5 million won as a crime of habitual gambling at the Ulsan District Court on July 7, 200 and sentenced to a summary order of 1.5 million won as a crime of habitual gambling at the Daegu District Court on August 12, 2005, a fine of 7.5 million won as a crime of the same crime at the Daegu District Court on August 12, 2005, and two years of suspension of the execution on November 12, 2008 as a crime of habitual gambling at the Changwon District Court was issued.

Defendant

B on December 23, 2004, the Daegu District Court issued a summary order of 300,000 won for the crime of gambling, and on March 3, 2005, the same court issued a summary order of 500,000 won for the crime of gambling, respectively, and on June 1, 2006, the same court was sentenced to a summary order of 50,000 won for the crime of gambling, with the imprisonment of 6 months for the crime of opening gambling and 2 years for the same court on September 11, 207, respectively.

In addition to C, the Defendants used Chapter 54, from April 6, 2012 to April 6, 2012, from around 04:00 to April 6, 2012, to around 06:30 to around 06:30, 2012, two among three persons use Chapter 10 for each of them, and 8 for each of them on the floor in order to put up 7 points in line with the plaque and the plaque on the floor in which 1,000 won per point is attached to the longer person. The Defendants ambling the 25 times in a way that she takes 1,00 won per point.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of E and C;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Each criminal history record and investigation report (report attached to the same type of judgment);

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the frequency of crimes, and the frequency of crimes;

1. Article 246 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for the suspension of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation;