logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.04.03 2012고정1550
위증
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant worked as the president of the “E Association” established for the purpose of constructing an officetel of 13th above the third ground floor above the ground surface (hereinafter referred to as the “instant building”) on the site of approximately 393 square meters in Si-si and D 2 lots from October 2007 to February 16, 2008. After expulsion from the partnership, the Defendant was able to establish the “E Association Emergency Countermeasures Committee” from the mid-2009.

On October 21, 2011, the Defendant appeared to take an oath as a witness of the case prosecuted against the building invasion against the F, Case Number No. 201Ga-Ma1341 in the Suwon-dong District Court in Ansan-si, Suwon-si.

(1) The Defendant testified in the above court that “The new comprehensive development had been interrupted while constructing the instant building, and the construction was completed on or around June 2001 at the time of the suspension of the construction, the third floor above the ground level and the second floor above the ground level, and that later, the construction process was no longer progress.”

However, after the suspension of construction work for the new construction project on June 2001, the construction work for the new construction project with the E union was actually carried out by the construction work, such as dismantling the structures such as the second floor slive floor and columns on the ground according to the new design drawings, which had been changed after the resumption of construction work since the mid- June 2008 after the commencement of new construction work with the E union.

Nevertheless, the defendant made a false testimony as above and perjury.

(2) In the above court, the Defendant testified that “this building had no outer wall and slab roof at the time of this building,” and even until now, the Defendant testified to the question “Is the condition that there was no outer wall and slab roof of the building.”

However, in fact, the above building is a building outer wall after the columns and outer walls of the second floor and the second floor of the building have been started around February 201, when the construction of the building was resumed to a police officer in the middle of June 2008.

arrow