The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is operating a parking lot with the trade name “E” in Ma in Masung City D.

The ratio of the part used as a parking lot in the total floor area of a building shall be at least 95%, but the ratio of the part used as a parking lot shall be at least 70% if the part used for the purpose other than a parking lot is a detached house, multi-family house, Class I neighborhood living facility, Class II neighborhood living facility, cultural and assembly facility, religious facility, sales facility, transportation facility, sports facility, business facility, or

The above parking lot operated by the Defendant is 595.3 square meters in the building area permitted under the Parking Lot Act, and the original parking area is 436.41 square meters in the parking lot (number of parking spaces) and 158.89 square meters in the area of the Sejong Vice General. On October 4, 2014, the Defendant installed six outdoor cleaning machine in the 6th of the above parking lot use site and used the exclusive parking building, an off-road parking lot, in violation of the ratio of the use of the parking lot (70%) under the Parking Lot Act, by allowing customers who completed the external accelerator car, who completed the above parking lot use site, to use the 6th of the above parking lot in the 6th of the 8th of the parking lot use site, to remove external water and conduct indoor cleaning.

2. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that even if the space of the parking lot is used as "dark" as "dark", the above space is still used as a parking lot, and the defendant's act does not constitute a violation of the Parking Lot Act.

3. The following circumstances recognized by the judgment room, on-site photographs, building ledgers, and investigation reports (Submission of suspect reference materials), namely, if the Defendant deducts the statutory parking lot size of 416.71m2 from the area of 436.41m2 of the parking lot approved by the Defendant (i.e., 59.3m2 x 70m2), 19.7m2 of the size is left. The Defendant did not reach 19.7m2, even if all of the size (1m2 per 6m2) of the earthquake cleaning machine installed by himself/herself, and thereby, did not reach 19.7m2 per 6m2.