logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.09.25 2020가단515256
건물인도
Text

The Plaintiff

A. Defendant A’s real estate listed in Annex A’s Schedule 1;

B. Defendant B shall set out in attached list No. 2.

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: To be as shown in the grounds for claims in attached Form;

(other than the part against E or F, however, of which the action is withdrawn);

A. Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant D: Each judgment deemed to be a confession (Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3)(1) of the Civil Procedure Act), Defendant A did not submit a written statement indicating his/her assertion, such as a reply or a preparatory document, despite having received a duplicate of the complaint of this case.

Defendant A was present at the date of pleading of the instant case, but is unable to pay rent from February 2, 2019.

“The Plaintiff’s claim was not clearly asserted.”

After all, Defendant A shall be deemed to have led to the confession of the assertion in the attached Form No. 1.

(2) While Defendant B, Defendant D, and Defendant D were served with a duplicate of the instant complaint, they did not submit a written statement indicating their arguments, such as the written reply or the briefs.

Defendant B and Defendant D did not appear on the designated date for pleading, even after being notified of due date.

After all, Defendant B and Defendant D shall be deemed to have led to the confession of the Plaintiff’s assertion on the grounds of the attached claim.

(b) Defendant C: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

arrow