(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.09.22 2014가단43372

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.09.22 2014가단43372

건물명도

Text

1. The Defendants deliver to the Plaintiff the buildings listed in the attached real estate list.

2. Defendant B is the Plaintiff 2,200.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. A. On January 30, 1999, the Defendant continued to lease the building listed in the [Attachment D]’s annexed real estate list (hereinafter “instant building”) as annual rent of KRW 12 million, and has renewed it. On January 30, 2012, the Defendant: (a) determined the lease deposit between A and the Plaintiff, an agent of the Deceased, as an agent of the Deceased; (b) determined the lease deposit as KRW 8 million; and (c) paid the lease deposit as interest, instead of paying it actually; (d) determined the annual rent as KRW 12 million; and (e) determined the lease period as of January 30, 2014; and (e) determined the lease period as of January 30, 2014 to be returned to the lessor; and (e) the Defendant, knowing that the building was old, shall be fully responsible for the repair and repair of the building; and (e) concluded the lease contract that shall be decided before the expiration of the contract (hereinafter “instant lease”).

B. On January 30, 2012, the Defendant entered into the instant lease agreement with A and the Plaintiff, an agent of the Deceased, separately agreed that “the Defendant shall invest KRW 6.4 million in overdue rent in 2010 and annual rent in 2011 and KRW 2 million in annual rent in 2012, and KRW 8.4 million in total as construction cost of the instant building repair instead of paying to the lessor, and the Defendant shall separately disburse KRW 8.4 million in construction cost, and the Defendant shall pay the said construction cost as the construction cost, and thereafter, shall not raise any problem as to any accident, such as building repair, from the date of leaving the instant building to the date of leaving the building (hereinafter “instant promise”).

C. On October 16, 2013, the Plaintiff, on behalf of the Deceased, paid 2.2 million won to the Defendant in arrears pursuant to the instant promise by October 23, 2013, on behalf of the Deceased, and wishes to pay 8.4 million won to cover the construction cost if the instant promise is not fulfilled, and to deliver the instant building.

‘The’ has notified the intention of its contents.

유사 판례

-제주지방법원 2015.01.27 2014가단7291

-제주지방법원 2015.02.03 2014가단14091

-제주지방법원 2015.03.17 2014가단6243

-제주지방법원 2018.01.26 2017가단2716

-서울동부지방법원 2015.03.10 2014가단121182