Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul High Court 2015Nu60534 (Law No. 17, 2016)
Title
Whether it constitutes a blanket transfer
Summary
Since the price for each of the instant lands and buildings was separately set between the other party to the transaction at the time of the sales contract for each of the instant lands and buildings, it does not constitute “when the distinction between the price for the land and buildings is unclear.”
Related statutes
Article 100 (2) of the Income Tax Act
Cases
Supreme Court Decision 2016Du44988 (Supreme Court Decision 2016.09)
Plaintiff-Appellant
○ Kim
Defendant-Appellee
○ Head of tax office
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court Decision 2015Nu60534 Decided June 17, 2016
Imposition of Judgment
2016.09.09
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.
Reasons
Examining the lower judgment and the grounds of appeal, the grounds of appeal by appellant are not included in the grounds of appeal under each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, or are deemed to fall under each subparagraph of paragraph (3). Therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per
September 9, 2016
Judges
Justices Lee Lee-young
Justices Kim Il-young
Jeju High Court Decision 201Hun-○
Justices Kim Il-young