Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

From October 1, 2008 to June 3, 201, A worked as the head of the project team for the development of hardware in charge of the design of booms for vehicles, the production management of PCB, etc., and the design of equipment in E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “damage Co., Ltd.”), a vehicle boom development and manufacturing company, which is the D Center 505 of the former D Center, during Ansan-si.

Defendant

B From May 7, 2010, 2010, in operating G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “G”), which is a company manufacturing the camerar (hereinafter referred to as “G”), the F building, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, 715-1, supplied B with black gamers to “E.”

1. The Defendants’ occupational breach of trust was a person in charge of the production and purchase of the victimized company E, and thus, the Defendants’ occupational duties were not to obtain a camerar from Defendant B’s G management, to develop the products of the victimized company using the black data for the vehicles of the victimized company, or to leak the black stuff development data of the victimized company, and to prevent the competition company from developing its products during the victimized company’s work.

Defendant

A around March 4, 2010, around March 4, 2010, upon receiving a proposal from Defendant B that “1,000 won per vehicle strings instead of lowering the unit price of the delivery,” it received the proposal.

Defendant

B from August 30, 2010 to October 31, 2010, from around August 30, 2010 to around October 31, 2010, the Defendant supplied 4,356 Kamerlars, a motor vehicle part, to the damaged company. On November 15, 2010, the supply unit price was adjusted, and three million won was remitted to the new bank account (H) with the Defendant’s name.

B. On September 2010, Defendant A received a proposal from Defendant B that “A may develop a video storage device using a communication function.” The proposal was accepted.

Therefore, Defendant B provided the development expenses to Defendant A in relation to the development of I B's cream in October 2010, and Defendant A.