The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles regarding the case 1) 2018 Go-Ma272, the Defendant did not interfere with the victim D’s return. The victim’s investigative agency and the court below’s statement are not reliable. Even if the victim’s former opening of opening of opening of opening of opening of opening of opening of opening of opening of opening of opening of opening of the hearing was possible to recover nature, and thus, cannot be deemed as “injury” under the Criminal Act, since it was defamation on November 21, 2018. ① The Defendant did not indicate false facts, ② the Defendant’s statement was against the “Trade Union,” and ② the Defendant’s statement was not against the “Trade Union,” and thus, it cannot be deemed that the victim’s reputation was damaged, not only by the labor union but also by the Defendant, but also by the Defendant’s statement for the public interest. ③ Even if the Defendant’s statement was made with respect to the Defendant’s speech of opening of opening of opening of opening of opening of the hearing of the hearing of the victim, it cannot be deemed that the Defendant’s reputation of the victims and 20.

No one cannot be deemed to have had the intent to defame or defame the defendant.

C) In the case of defamation as of December 6, 2018, the Defendant recognized the fact that the Defendant posted the same article as that indicated in this part of the facts charged, but it cannot be deemed that the honor of G, H, and I was damaged thereby. B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (the imprisonment of six months, the suspension of execution of two years, and the fine of 1.5 million won) is too unreasonable.