beta
Text
1. Of the real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff:
A. The Selection C, D, E, F, G, H, and I shall be 5/480 shares, each of whom shall be 3.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. 1/6 shares of S, U, V, W, X, Y (Z, AA, AB, AC, L, and M on the register of registry) are owned by each 1/6 shares of 3,021 square meters of T in net 3,021 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”), and X and Y completed the registration of ownership transfer.
D. The name titleholder S died on July 7, 1995 and died on October 20, 1948 by the selected person C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, and U.S., Defendant A died on October 20, 1948, the name titleholder V died on October 20, 1947 and the name titleholder N, the name titleholder W died on September 9, 1948 and became the heir of each property.
On May 10, 1961, the International Civil Code No. D filed a lawsuit claiming the transfer of ownership on December 11, 1992 against the above S, Defendant A, N, W, X, and Y, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on March 18, 1996 on the ground that he received the donation of the instant land from the above S, et al. al. and five others.
However, as seen above, W among the other party to the lawsuit, was already killed in 1948, before the lawsuit was filed, and X and Y are no longer dead.
Applicant B purchased the instant land from D on August 5, 1996 and completed the registration of ownership transfer on August 7, 1996.
B. On April 20, 197, the Plaintiff merged with the passenger farmland improvement association. On March 31, 1952, as the telegraph of the said passenger farmland improvement association, the net repair association, established on March 31, 1952, occupied the instant land from October 27, 1955, and continued possession until May 15, 2009, including the instant land, until the implementation of an urban development project.
The plaintiff asserted the completion of the statute of limitations for the acquisition of the land of this case and filed a lawsuit claiming the cancellation of the ownership transfer registration against D and the designated parties, and the court recognized the completion of the statute of limitations for the acquisition by possession of the plaintiff and filed by D.