Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 11, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 08:30 on December 11, 201, from around 08:30 to around 10:30 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s parking lot construction work for a period of up to two hours by: (b) the installation site of a street parking lot conducted by the victim C (ma, 52 years of age) of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; and (c) the Defendant’s construction work of a parking lot on the ground of his/her damage to the Defendant’s building due to such work; and (d) the Defendant interfered with

2. The Defendant of Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, and the third floor residents, from around 08:51 to around 10:45 on December 18, 2019, when the victim E, a stock company, etc. was ordered by the Defendant from around the Defendant’s residence in Seongdong-gu, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, which is located adjacent to the Defendant’s residence, carried out civil engineering works, etc. ordered by the victim E, the owner of the above land, etc., the Defendant could not use plastics connected to the equipment installed for the installation of fences, and interfere with the victim’s public works by force, such as putting them on the construction site

Summary of Evidence

“ 2020 Many395”

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A written statement of C, F and G: "20, 478";

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. On-site photographs of the police statement C;

1. Investigation Report (Evidence List No. 15) [Defendant and defense counsel] Inasmuch as the construction work of a parking lot was committed in this case in order to prevent the damage to the property on the building on the part of the defendant, and to preserve the evidence related to dispute with H Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association, the defendant's act is justified as it does not violate social rules. However, in light of the background of this case, contents of each act, and the degree of continued time, it is difficult to view the defendant's act as a justifiable act because the supplementary nature, reasonableness, etc. is not recognized, and the above argument is not acceptable.] The application of statutes.

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;