logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.04.18 2017고단820
사기등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years in August 10, 2015 on November 10, 2015 to imprisonment with prison labor for occupational and practical negligence in the Changwon District Court Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 15, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant A is a person who operates “I” and “J” as a fishery products processing business chain in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si H.

No person shall receive subsidies by false application or by other unlawful means.

A. In accordance with a plan to promote the project for supporting the processing facilities of fishery products in mountainous districts to contribute to the revitalization of the economy of fishing villages, the Gyeongnam-do, in the course of the project that grants subsidies equivalent to 60% of the total project cost (30% of the national project cost, 10% of the Do cost, and 20% of the Si cost) to the subsidized business operators under the condition that the subsidized business operators bear 40% of the total project cost. The Defendant selected the I operated as the subsidized business operator, and the Defendant selected the I as the subsidized business operator, to support the project that newly constructs one local fishery product processing plant in Changwon-si, Yongsan-si, Changsi.

The Defendant, in compliance with the terms and conditions of granting subsidies, received part of the construction cost from the construction business entity without the intention or ability to spend the same as the above project cost, and intended to receive subsidies by means of submitting false evidentiary documents, etc. to the public official in charge. On October 2012, the Defendant, at the above I Office, proposed that B, who is a construction business entity, request the construction work of the above I Office, prepare a written contract to unfix the construction cost, tax invoice, etc. to submit evidentiary documents to B in the documents in the original city, etc. at the later time when requesting the construction of the above I Office to submit the above I Office's external facility construction work, and accepted the above B, submitted a written estimate to de facto estimate of the construction cost to KRW 32,470,00,000,000 for the said construction work, and accordingly, the Defendant, as above, received a written estimate to 422

arrow