Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of F (hereinafter referred to as “F (hereinafter referred to as “F”) established for the purpose of manufacturing, etc. food in Cheongbuk-do E, Cheongbuk-do, and Defendant B is a person who operates the business of manufacturing and installing food in the name of “H” after registering the business in the name of G.

In order to create added value by using rice and agricultural products produced in the border region on March 2012, 2012, the company that intends to establish a processing factory in the traditional liquor shall bear 50% of the total project cost as its own contribution, and 20% of the project cost as a condition to raise funds from low-interest loans (Do 9%, Si Gun 21%) was implemented and publicly announced as the "I" project in 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the "project in this case").

On the other hand, in order to select a subsidized project operator as a subsidized project operator in relation to the project of the above case, the ability to bear the subsidized project cost, and the subsidized project operator should execute the subsidized project first in advance to receive the subsidy actually.

Defendants are willing to receive subsidies from the project of this case to establish a manufacturing factory to prevent depreciation with the funds of this case, and to attract investors in the course of operating F, by means of submitting false documents, such as removing factory construction costs, machinery equipment costs, etc. without bearing their own contributions on April 2012. The Defendants are willing to receive subsidies from the project of this case, and to attract investors.

9.5. Around the day of issuance of a balance certificate of 650,000,000 won to the F (State) account by the J which is a credit service provider and immediately withdraw the said funds and return them to the J:

9. The facts at the Cheong-do Office located in the 70 Cheong-do, Seoyang-si, Seoyang-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, in around 14. Cheong-do, did not have the intent or ability to bear self-charges, and would receive subsidies by the method of submitting relevant documents by clearing the factory construction cost, machinery installation cost, etc., the victim Cheong-do, but the above false balance certificate is issued to employees in the victim Cheong-do