1. On September 4, 2014, the Defendant based on the executory exemplification of the Cheongju District Court Decision 2005Da7474 Decided C.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 4, 2014, the Defendant filed a lawsuit claiming loans against Cheongju District Court Decision 2005Da7474, and received a judgment against Cheongju District Court Decision 2005Da7474, to pay 30 million won and its delay damages (hereinafter the judgment of this case). On September 4, 2014, the Defendant seized and executed the attachment of movable property indicated in the attached list, which was kept in the building located at the

(hereinafter, this case's compulsory execution)

As a child born between C and D, the Plaintiff is living together with D at the above domicile of C, and C was married with D on December 22, 2008, but it was registered as a person living together with D on the resident registration.

C. The Plaintiff purchased and paid the price for the article Nos. 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 among the movables listed in the separate sheet as listed below.

On March 8, 2014, Plaintiff E 1,430,000 won for the seller’s payment method for the e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail 1,430,000 won for the purchase date of seized articles, Plaintiff F 950,000 won for the account transfer account transfer of Plaintiff 5 electronic siren e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail 680,000 won for Plaintiff Home Packer 680,000 won for the purchase date of seized articles on February 12, 2014; Plaintiff 8TV (INCO e-mail 87,700 won for the account transfer of Plaintiff e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail e-mail 1, 2014; Plaintiff 7 e-mail 1,500

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim

A. The movables listed in the separate sheet Nos. 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 are recognized as being owned by the Plaintiff, who is the purchaser and the settlement party for the purchase price.

According to the evidence evidence Nos. 3 and 6, even before the enforcement of the instant judgment, the Defendant seized and executed the provisional products kept in custody of the said building as an executory exemplification of the instant judgment even before the compulsory execution of the instant case, and the enforcement officer sold the said provisional products to H on February 11, 2014, and delivered KRW 2.5 million out of the proceeds from the sale to D, who is the former spouse of C, and the movables listed in the attached list Nos. 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 on the same day.