1. The Defendant’s disposition of refusal to register as bereaved family members of a person eligible for veteran’s compensation rendered on August 20, 2015 is revoked.

2. The plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. Nonparty B, the Plaintiff’s spouse, (hereinafter “the deceased”), served as a police official for 30 years since being appointed as a policeman on March 30, 1980, and voluntarily retired on February 28, 2014.

B. On April 201, the Deceased filed an administrative litigation against the Public Official Pension Service for the revocation of the foregoing non-approval (hereinafter “prior administrative litigation”) by filing an application for medical care with the Public Official Pension Service on the grounds that he/she was suffering from chronic renals, cerebrovascular diseases due to non-permanent work, such as overtime work, night work, holiday work, etc. while serving at the Cpolice Academy in the Manyang-si Police Station, the Deceased filed an administrative litigation seeking the revocation of the above non-approval (hereinafter “prior administrative litigation”). Some winnings in the first instance trial, and the judgment winnings in the second instance and becomes final and conclusive, thereby obtaining approval for medical care for official duties from the said Service.

C. On June 10, 2014, the Deceased filed an application with the Defendant for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that he/she applied for a Magoan-Udne’s disease, brain dives disease, etc., but died on August 26, 2014. On September 26, 2014, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff, who is a bereaved family member of the Deceased, of his/her decision equivalent to the requirements for a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State and a person eligible for veteran’s compensation. The Plaintiff filed an administrative litigation with the court No. 2014Gudan4379, but withdrawn the lawsuit

On April 30, 2015, the Plaintiff asserted that there was an application for the Madne Span, Madne, Madne, Madne, Madne, etc. of the Deceased (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the instant injury”). In addition to the instant injury and disease, the Plaintiff initially asserted that the Plaintiff had applied for the Madney, Madneum, Madneum, and Madney’s Madney’s disease accompanied by the Madne’s merger certificate, but withdrawn it on the fifth day

The Defendant filed an application for the registration of bereaved family members of the deceased. The objective evidence was not verified that the deceased’s injury to the State caused the performance of duties or education and training directly related to the protection of the people’s life and property, and the deceased’s injury to the State.