The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On June 2013, the Defendant, while drinking D and alcoholic beverages in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, damaged the reputation of the victim F by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “Around 6 to 7:0, the Defendant: (a) Hashed Hashed Hashed Hashed Hashed Hashed Hashed Hashed Hashed Hashed Hashed Hashed Hashed Hashed Hashed Hashed Hashed Hashed Hashed Hashed Hashed Hashed Had Hashed Hashed Hashed Hashed Had Ha

B. From October 2013 to November 2013 of the same year, the Defendant damaged the victim F’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “F was going to another male and female.”

2. Paragraph 1-A:

There are evidence to support this part of the facts charged in the charge described in this paragraph, D's factual confirmation, D's police statement, witness D's legal statement, and D continued to make a statement corresponding to the facts charged.

However, it is difficult to believe that D's statements are not consistent for the following reasons.

D The fact-finding document is to be drawn up by the person himself/herself, and to be signed only with his/her address, date, and signature. However, F, which submitted to an investigation agency, stated that the confirmation document prepared by him/her is written as D with the remaining part of the confirmation document prepared by him/her, and it is very exceptional to write out some of the parts other than the signature.

In addition, the defendant asserts that the defendant is D, while D and F are all not D, they do not disclose who is not D (in the case of I, J, and K coming from the recording recording, there is no difference between the defendant and F).