A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who has operated a delivery company called “D” in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

1. When E, who worked as an employee in D, establishes a separate delivery company called “F” independently, the Defendant: (a) forged a confirmation document in the name of G and H; and (b) intended to submit it as evidence with a written complaint against E.

Around December 2014, the Defendant forged evidence related to the confirmation of facts in the G name entered the document list into “written confirmation” by means of a computer in the foregoing D office, and the contents thereof, “E performing the work in C has taken off the number of persons who perform the work in C at the seat of the person who made the statement. C. There is a fact that it is not known to C. There is a fact that it is not known to C.),” and then printed it into the printer, printed it into the printer, then written confirmation of the fact in the name of G’s name, stating “G”, “S Dongdong-gu I”, and “J” in the contact column, and written a confirmation of the fact in the name of G with the seal affixed to that name.

However, the fact is that G does not have consented to the preparation or preparation of the above confirmation document by the defendant, and there was no fact that E did not speak to G as stated in the confirmation document.

Accordingly, the defendant forged evidence by misappropriation of G's name and preparing a confirmation document stating false contents.

B. The Defendant forged evidence related to H’s certificate of fact in H’s name was prepared at the same date and place as that of paragraph 1(a) in the same manner as that of paragraph 1(a).

However, the fact is that H did not agree to the preparation or preparation of the above confirmation document by the defendant, and that E did not speak to H as stated in the confirmation document.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged evidence by misappropriation of H's name and by preparing a false confirmation document.