All appeals by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The defendants of the grounds for appeal asserted that the punishment (the punishment of 8 months, additional collection of 6,640,000 won, the imprisonment of 6 months, 6 months and 1 year of suspended execution) declared by the court below is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that it is too unfasible and unfair.

2. The lower court determined that Defendant A had been punished for the suspension of the execution of the same crime in 2008, but again, Defendant B was punished for the same crime, and the Defendants appeared to have an attitude against the Defendants in the confession of each of the instant crimes, and that the period of the Defendants’ brokerage of sexual traffic was not relatively short. In so doing, the lower court determined each of the Defendants’ respective punishment in consideration of the following:

In addition to the above sentencing conditions, even if comprehensively considering all of the sentencing conditions in the instant case, including the Defendants’ age, sex, environment, motive for the commission of the crime, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s sentencing appears to have been conducted within the reasonable scope of discretion. Even in light of the fact that the figures of the Defendants and their family members want to take the preference against the Defendants, the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or unreasonable.

Therefore, the Defendants and the Prosecutor’s above assertion are without merit.

3. In conclusion, each appeal by the Defendants and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.