All appeals by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal appealed from the lower court’s sentence (2 years and six months in prison, Defendant A’s imprisonment, and Defendant B’s imprisonment with prison labor) so as to be too unreasonable. The prosecutor appealed from the lower court’s sentence against the Defendants because it is too unfasible and unfair.

2. The fact that the defendants are all aware of their mistakes and are against the defendants is favorable to the defendants.

On the other hand, the defendants had already been punished for the same kind of crime several times, and the defendant A had a repeated crime period for the same kind of crime, but did not have a repeated crime period for the crime of this case, is disadvantageous to the defendants.

In addition, taking into account the various circumstances revealed in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendants’ age, sex, environment, motive and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s assertion are not acceptable on the grounds that the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or it is not deemed unfair because it is too heavy.

3. Conclusion, the appeal by the Defendants and the public prosecutor is without merit, and all appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.